Ulta Beauty 2024: how the US beauty-retail leader faced Sephora-Kohl's competitive pressure and a 2024 same-store-sales decline that ended its growth streak

The decade of growth before 2024

Ulta Beauty had built one of the most consistent retail growth stories in modern US retail through the 2010s and into the 2020s:

• Revenue growth from ~$1.8B (2010) to $11.2B (FY2023): approximately 5x growth across the decade-plus.
• Store count from ~600 (2010) to ~1,400+ (2024): more than doubling.
• Positive comparable store sales for 50+ consecutive quarters through fiscal 2023, an unusually long growth streak.
• Mass + prestige brand-positioning: Ulta's distinctive feature has been carrying both mass-market beauty (drugstore brands like Maybelline, L'Oreal Paris, NYX) and prestige beauty (MAC, Clinique, Lancome) in single stores. The combined offering attracted both budget-conscious and prestige customers.
• Ulta Beauty Rewards loyalty program: ~44M+ members by 2024, with high engagement and per-member spending.
• Salon services in-store: structural differentiator from Sephora's product-only model. Salon services provide reason for high-frequency visits and additional engagement.

The Sephora-Kohl's competitive emergence

The Sephora-Kohl's partnership (announced December 2020, first shops opened August 2021, ~850+ by 2024) was the most significant competitive development Ulta faced. The partnership directly targeted Ulta's middle-American suburban demographic:

• Geographic overlap: Kohl's store locations overlap substantially with Ulta's footprint in suburban and mid-tier markets.
• Prestige-beauty positioning: Sephora-Kohl's brought Sephora's prestige-beauty positioning to demographics that previously had to drive to malls for Sephora.
• Beauty Insider integration: Sephora's loyalty program (~25M+ US members) created switching pressure on Ulta's loyalty program.
• Ulta-Target response: Ulta launched its own partnership with Target in November 2020 with similar structure (Ulta-operated boutiques inside Target stores). Ulta at Target reached ~600+ locations by 2024.
• Demographic positioning differences: Target's younger/higher-income demographic vs Kohl's broader middle-market created somewhat different competitive battles in each partnership.
• Net competitive effect: prestige-beauty distribution accelerated for both Sephora and Ulta; the structural advantage shifted slightly toward Sephora because Kohl's-Sephora locations are larger and more visible in Kohl's stores than Ulta-at-Target locations are in Target stores.

The 2024 same-store-sales decline and the strategic challenge

Through 2024, Ulta's comparable-store sales weakened:

• Q4 FY2023 (announced March 2024): comparable sales +1.7%, the slowest growth in years.
• Q1 FY2024 (announced May 2024): comparable sales +1.6%, continued deceleration.
• Q2 FY2024 (announced August 2024): comparable sales -1.2%, the first negative quarterly comp in over a decade.
• Drivers cited by Ulta management: increased competitive pressure (Sephora-Kohl's), prestige-beauty consumer pickiness, broader consumer-spending normalization post-2021-2023 inflation surge, some self-inflicted operational issues.
• Reduced guidance: Ulta cut FY2024 same-store-sales guidance to flat-to-down and reduced operating margin expectations.
• Stock reaction: Ulta stock declined approximately 30%+ from 2024 highs at the Q2 FY2024 announcement, reflecting investor reassessment of the growth narrative.

The CEO transition and the strategic response

On August 22, 2024, Ulta announced Dave Kimbell would retire and that Kecia Steelman (Chief Operating Officer) would become CEO. Steelman had been at Ulta for 11 years in various roles. The transition was announced as orderly and was timed to allow strategic-reset under new leadership:

• Steelman background: COO since 2021, prior roles including Chief Stores Officer and Chief Field Operations Officer. Operations-focused executive with deep Ulta institutional knowledge.
• Strategic priorities articulated: store-experience improvements, product-merchandising adjustments, accelerated digital and loyalty investments, continued Target partnership refinement.
• Cost-discipline focus: Steelman has signaled selective cost reductions including some corporate headcount and some marketing-spend rationalization.
• Investor communication: Steelman's first earnings call (Q3 FY2024 reported December 5, 2024) emphasized that the strategic-reset would take multiple quarters rather than producing immediate inflection.
• Buffer-period framing: Steelman has positioned 2025 as a transition year rather than a recovery year, calibrating analyst expectations for delayed same-store-sales acceleration.

How RGM thinks about category-leader first-decline moments

Ulta's 2024 trajectory is the worked example of how category-leader retail businesses navigate first-decline moments after years of consistent growth. The structural pattern: long growth streaks build investor expectations that continued growth is permanent; the first decline reveals that competitive pressure, category maturation, and operational challenges have been building under the surface; the post-decline strategic response determines whether the decline is a one-time correction or the start of structural decline.

Our framework for clients in similar category-leader first-decline situations: the appropriate response is honest acknowledgment of competitive and category challenges combined with operational discipline rather than dramatic strategic-direction reset. Ulta's response so far (cost discipline, store-experience investment, digital/loyalty acceleration, leadership transition that preserves operational continuity) is structurally appropriate. The risk is overreaction (dramatic store closures, drastic merchandising changes, abandoning structural advantages) that could damage long-term brand position to fix short-term comparable-sales metrics. We tell clients facing similar first-decline moments to evaluate honestly whether the underlying competitive position remains strong (often yes; Ulta's 1,400+ stores, 44M+ loyalty members, salon services are real moats) and to respond with operational discipline rather than strategic panic.

Frequently asked questions

Related