The Brand Gap

The Brand Gap opens with the definition the industry adopted: a brand is not a logo, an identity system, or a product — it is a PERSON'S GUT FEELING about a product, service, or company, because brands are defined by individuals, not companies. The gap of the title is organizational: strategists who can't feel and creatives who can't argue, producing brands that are either smart-but-dead or beautiful-but-empty. His bridge is five disciplines — differentiate (answer who are you, what do you do, why does it matter), collaborate, innovate, validate, and cultivate.

'A brand is a person's gut feeling…' — probably the most-slided definition in branding; the three questions of differentiation; 'zag' — when everybody zigs, zag (his follow-up book's whole thesis); the onliness statement ('our brand is the ONLY ___ that ___'); and charisma defined — any brand for which people believe there's no substitute.

It remains the fastest cure for logo-equals-brand thinking and the cleanest brief for design-strategy collaboration — written as a 'whiteboard overview' you can read in an hour and argue about for a decade. Pair its perception-first definition with Romaniuk's measurement school: Neumeier tells you the brand lives in their gut; Ehrenberg-Bass tells you how to audit what's actually in there.

Neumeier — a Silicon Valley brand designer for Apple, Adobe, and HP — wrote it as a deliberately short 'whiteboard overview' after years watching strategy decks and design comps talk past each other. New Riders published it 2003; the slide-style format became its own genre.

Etymology: source.

Search interest for this term over the last five years:

View interest-over-time on Google Trends →

Areas of marketing where the brand gap is a core concern: