Awareness, Attitudes & Usage (AAU)

An awareness, attitudes and usage (AAU) study — also written as an A&U study — is a market-research survey that measures three linked dimensions of a brand's standing among its audience: awareness (who knows the brand and its advertising), attitudes (what people think and feel about it — perceptions, preference, image), and usage (who actually buys and uses it, how often, and in what way). By measuring all three together, an AAU study builds a rounded picture of where a brand sits in its market, from recognition through perception to behavior. It is typically run as a tracking study, repeated on a consistent basis with a consistent questionnaire and audience definition, so changes over time are comparable. The result is a recurring read on brand health that connects what people know, what they believe, and what they do — the three stages most brand and category dynamics play out across.

An awareness, attitudes and usage study matters because no single metric captures a brand's position, and the three dimensions illuminate each other. Awareness without favorable attitudes signals a known but unloved brand; strong attitudes without usage signals a brand people admire but do not buy; usage without strong attitudes can signal vulnerable, habit-driven custom. Measuring all three reveals where a brand is strong, where it leaks between stages, and what marketing should address — building awareness, shifting perception, or converting attitude into behavior. Because it is tracked over time, an AAU study also shows whether marketing is moving these measures, making it a foundational tool for brand strategy, positioning, and measuring the longer-term effect of marketing that does not show up immediately in sales.

An awareness, attitudes and usage study is broader than any one of the metrics it contains. Ad awareness, for example, measures only whether a specific campaign was noticed — a narrow, top-funnel cut-through measure. An AAU study includes awareness (often brand awareness as well as ad awareness) but goes much further, adding attitudes and usage to build a full-funnel picture. So ad awareness is one possible component or cousin of the awareness dimension, while the AAU study is the whole framework spanning knowledge, perception, and behavior. Relying on ad awareness alone tells you a campaign cut through; an AAU study tells you whether that cut-through is connected to favorable attitudes and actual usage, which is the difference between measuring a campaign and measuring a brand.

The AAU framework also differs from chasing any single tracking metric in isolation. Because awareness, attitudes, and usage are linked stages, the value comes from reading them together: a gap between high awareness and low usage points to an attitude or availability problem; rising attitudes ahead of usage may foreshadow growth; usage running ahead of attitudes may flag fragile loyalty. A single metric cannot reveal these patterns. The AAU study is essentially a diagnostic structure for brand health, designed so the three measures cross-check and explain one another. That is why it is a foundational research instrument rather than just a survey of one thing — it maps the path from knowing a brand, to feeling something about it, to using it, and shows where along that path the brand is winning or losing.

Using an awareness, attitudes and usage study well means running it as a consistent tracking study — same questionnaire, same audience definition, same method over time — so movements reflect real change rather than survey noise, and reading the three dimensions together rather than cherry-picking one. It means using the gaps between awareness, attitudes, and usage to diagnose where the brand leaks (known but not liked, liked but not bought) and to direct marketing at the right stage. It means treating the AAU study as the brand-health backbone that gives narrow metrics like ad awareness their context, and connecting its longer-term measures to business outcomes, so attitude and usage shifts are eventually validated against sales rather than admired on their own.

The failures are running the study inconsistently (changing questions, samples, or timing so trends are unreliable), reading one dimension in isolation (celebrating awareness while ignoring weak usage), treating attitudinal improvement as proof of business success without connecting it to behavior and sales, and confusing a narrow metric like ad awareness with the full AAU framework. The discipline is to use the awareness, attitudes and usage study as a consistent, full-funnel brand-tracking instrument — reading awareness, attitudes, and usage together to find where the brand wins and leaks, giving context to narrower metrics, and validating its longer-term measures against real behavior and business results.

Awareness, attitudes and usage (AAU) — a tracking survey of brand awareness, attitudes, and usage behavior — is a foundational brand-health instrument that reads the three linked dimensions together.

Etymology: source.

Search interest for this term over the last five years:

View interest-over-time on Google Trends →

Areas of marketing where awareness, attitudes & usage (aau) is a core concern: