Growth Marketing Glossary

Cost Per Point (CPP)

cost per pointnoun

The price of one rating point. Cost per point (CPP) is what it costs to reach one percent of a target audience in TV or radio — the efficiency yardstick of broadcast media buying.

media spend÷ rating points boughtcost per point
Schematic — spend divided by the rating points it buys
Term
Cost per point (CPP)
Is
Cost to buy one rating point
One point
Reaches 1% of the target audience
Used in
TV and radio media buying

Parts of speech & senses

cost per point · noun
  1. Cost per point (CPP) is the cost to buy a single rating point — reaching one percent of a target audience — in television or radio, a core media-buying efficiency metric. "Daytime had a far lower cost per point than prime time."

What cost per point is

Cost per point (CPP) is the cost of buying a single rating point in broadcast media — and one rating point means reaching one percent of a defined target audience. So cost per point answers a buyer's basic efficiency question: how much does it cost to put a message in front of one percent of the people you are trying to reach? It is calculated by dividing the cost of a media schedule or spot by the rating points it delivers against the target. Because it is denominated in rating points rather than raw impressions, cost per point is the natural efficiency yardstick in television and radio, where audiences have long been measured in ratings. A daytime spot and a prime-time spot can be compared on cost per point even though their absolute prices differ wildly, because the metric normalizes price against audience delivered.

Cost per point matters because it lets media buyers compare the efficiency of different dayparts, stations, programs, and markets on a common footing. A high-priced prime-time spot may actually be efficient if it delivers a lot of rating points, while a cheap late-night spot may be expensive per point if almost no one is watching. By dividing cost by points delivered, the metric strips out the distortion of absolute price and reveals what the buyer is really paying for audience. It is also the building block for planning a campaign's weight: knowing the cost per point in a market, a planner can estimate what it will cost to buy a target number of gross rating points, which is how broadcast budgets are built from the ground up.

Cost per point versus rating points and exposure

Cost per point is easy to confuse with the rating-point measures it is priced against, but they answer different questions. A rating point — and its aggregates, gross rating points and target rating points — measures audience delivery: how much of the target a schedule reached and how often. Cost per point measures the price of that delivery: how much each point of audience costs to buy. One is a volume measure, the other an efficiency measure. You buy a number of rating points to hit a reach-and-frequency goal, and cost per point tells you how cheaply you bought them. So target rating points say how much you delivered against the target, while cost per point says what each of those points cost. Reading them together connects audience weight to budget.

Cost per point also differs from exposure and from impression-based pricing. An exposure is a single audience member's encounter with the message — one opportunity-to-see — whereas a rating point is a percentage of the whole target audience, and cost per point prices that percentage. Impression pricing like CPM charges per thousand individual exposures and is the currency of digital display; cost per point charges per percentage-point of a target audience and is the currency of broadcast. They are not interchangeable: CPM counts absolute impressions, cost per point counts audience percentage. Planners moving between television and digital often convert between the two frameworks, but the underlying units differ, and treating a rating point as if it were an impression, or a cost per point as if it were a CPM, leads to mispriced plans.

Using cost per point well

Using cost per point well means treating it as the broadcast efficiency yardstick — cost divided by rating points delivered against the right target — and always being clear about which audience the points are counted against, since a point against a broad population is not the same as a point against a narrow target. It means comparing dayparts, stations, and markets on cost per point rather than absolute price, using it to plan campaign weight (estimating the budget needed for a target number of rating points), and reading it alongside the rating-point volume it prices. Because typical cost per point varies by market, season, and audience, benchmark it within the right context rather than across mismatched ones, and pair it with reach-and-frequency goals so efficiency serves the plan rather than driving it.

The failures are comparing cost per point across mismatched audiences or markets as though the points were equivalent, chasing a low cost per point into dayparts that deliver the wrong audience, confusing the efficiency metric (cost per point) with the volume metric (rating points delivered), and treating a broadcast cost per point as interchangeable with a digital CPM. The discipline is to use cost per point as the price of one rating point against a clearly defined target, benchmark it in the right context, and connect it to the gross or target rating points a campaign needs, so the metric guides efficient broadcast buying without being divorced from the audience it is supposed to reach.

Worked example. A planner is choosing between prime-time and daytime television to reach a target audience. Prime time costs far more per spot, so on price alone it looks expensive. But computing cost per point — spend divided by the rating points each daypart delivers against the target — shows prime time is competitive because it delivers many points, while a cheap overnight slot is dear per point because almost no one in the target is watching. The planner builds the schedule on cost per point, then checks it delivers the reach-and-frequency goal. The lesson: cost per point prices one rating point against the target, normalizing absolute price into a true efficiency measure for broadcast buying. (Illustrative; RGM analysis.)
Failure modes to watch. Comparing cost per point across mismatched audiences or markets as if the points were equivalent; chasing a low cost per point into dayparts that deliver the wrong audience; confusing the efficiency metric with the rating-point volume it prices; and treating a broadcast cost per point as interchangeable with a digital CPM.

Synonyms & antonyms

Synonyms

CPPcost per rating pointcost per GRP

Antonyms

cost per milleabsolute spot price

Origin & history

Cost per point (CPP) — the cost to buy one rating point, reaching one percent of a target audience — is the efficiency yardstick of television and radio media buying.

Etymology: source.

Usage trends

Search interest for this term over the last five years:

View interest-over-time on Google Trends →

Common questions

What is cost per point (CPP)?
The cost to buy a single rating point — reaching one percent of a target audience — in television or radio. It is calculated as media cost divided by rating points delivered, the core efficiency metric of broadcast media buying.
What is a rating point?
A rating point represents one percent of a defined target audience. Cost per point prices that one percent, so it tells a buyer how much it costs to reach one percent of the people the campaign is trying to reach.
How is cost per point different from CPM?
Cost per point prices a percentage of a target audience and is the broadcast currency; CPM prices a thousand individual impressions and is the digital currency. The units differ, so the two are not interchangeable.

Resources & people to follow

Curated, non-competitor resources verified per term.

Related training

Disciplines

Areas of marketing where cost per point (cpp) is a core concern:

Sources

  1. trendsGoogle Trends — "cost per point"