Growth Marketing Glossary

Front

frontnoun

A shared inbox for teams. Front pulls email, chat, SMS, and social into one workspace so a whole team can triage, assign, and answer customer conversations together.

scattered channelsunify team messagingone shared inbox
Schematic — many channels merged into one team workspace
Term
Front
Is
Customer-communication platform
Core
Shared team inbox
Founded
2013

Parts of speech & senses

front · noun
  1. Front is a customer-communication platform built around a shared inbox that unifies email, chat, SMS, and social messages into one workspace so teams can triage, assign, and reply together. "Support and success both work customer email out of Front."

What Front is

Front is a customer-communication platform organized around a shared inbox. The problem it solves is that customer conversations arrive on many channels — email, live chat, SMS, WhatsApp, social messages — and often need to be handled by a team rather than one person, yet a normal personal inbox is built for a single user and hides the work from everyone else. Front pulls those channels into one workspace where a whole team can see the queue, assign messages to whoever should own them, comment internally on a thread before replying, and answer with the polish of a personal email rather than the stiff ticket format of a traditional help desk. It aims to combine the collaboration and structure of support software with the human feel of ordinary email.

Founded in 2013 by Mathilde Collin and Laurent Perrin and headquartered in San Francisco, Front is used by support, success, operations, and account teams that manage high volumes of external conversation and need shared visibility and accountability. Alongside the shared inbox it adds the tooling teams need at scale — routing and assignment rules, automation, internal comments, analytics on response times and volume, and an open API for integrations. The through-line is keeping communication personal while making it a coordinated team activity, so nothing falls through the cracks and no customer gets two conflicting replies.

Front versus a help desk or a personal inbox

The sharpest contrast is with a traditional ticketing help desk such as Zendesk. A classic help desk converts every customer message into a numbered ticket and routes it through a system that is efficient but often impersonal, and it can feel bureaucratic to both the agent and the customer. Front keeps the interface closer to email — replies look and feel like a normal message, not a case number — while adding the assignment, collaboration, and analytics a team needs. The bet is that many businesses, especially those valuing high-touch relationships, want the coordination of a help desk without surrendering the personal tone of direct email. That positioning is Front's main differentiator in a crowded category.

Front also differs from simply sharing a generic inbox like a support@ address among several people. Shared logins to one mailbox are chaos: two agents reply to the same message, others go unanswered, and there is no record of who did what. Front adds the missing structure — clear ownership of each conversation, internal notes that customers never see, and visibility into the whole team's workload — without turning messages into tickets. So the useful way to place it is between two poles: more collaborative and accountable than a raw shared mailbox, and more personal and email-like than a heavyweight ticketing system. Which pole you lean toward depends on whether your priority is relationship warmth or industrial-scale case management.

Using Front well

Front earns its value when the team actually uses its coordination features rather than treating it as a fancier inbox. That means setting clear ownership so every conversation has an assignee and none drifts unanswered, using internal comments to align on a reply before it goes out rather than forwarding threads around, and building routing rules so messages reach the right person automatically. Because the tool preserves an email-like feel, teams should lean into that strength — replies that read as human and specific, not as templated ticket responses — while using the shared visibility to prevent the duplicate or contradictory answers that plague uncoordinated inboxes.

The failures are mostly about underusing the platform or misjudging fit. A team that adopts Front but ignores assignment and just all-reads a shared queue recreates the very chaos the tool exists to fix. Skipping the analytics means missing where response times slip or volume spikes. And choosing Front for the wrong job matters: an operation that genuinely needs deep, structured ticketing, SLAs, and self-service knowledge bases at massive scale may be better served by a full help-desk suite, while a team whose edge is personal relationships is exactly where Front shines. Matched to the right situation and used with real ownership and collaboration, Front turns scattered channels and a messy shared address into a coordinated, personal customer-communication practice.

Worked example. A growing company routes customer email to a shared support@ address that three people check haphazardly, so some messages get answered twice and others not at all. It moves to Front, connecting that email plus its chat and SMS channels into one workspace. Now each incoming message is assigned an owner, teammates leave internal notes to agree on a tricky reply before sending, and a manager can see response times and workload at a glance. Replies still read like normal, personal emails rather than ticket numbers, so customers feel handled by a person while the team finally has shared visibility and clear accountability. (Illustrative; RGM analysis.)
Failure modes to watch. Adopting Front but ignoring assignment and collaboration, recreating shared-inbox chaos; skipping the analytics so slipping response times go unnoticed; choosing it when the job truly needs heavyweight ticketing and SLAs; and defaulting to templated replies that waste its personal, email-like strength.

Synonyms & antonyms

Synonyms

shared team inboxcustomer communication platformcollaborative inbox

Antonyms

personal email inboximpersonal ticketing system

Origin & history

Front is a customer-communication platform founded in 2013, built around a shared inbox that unifies email, chat, SMS, and social messages into one team workspace.

Etymology: source.

Usage trends

Search interest for this term over the last five years:

View interest-over-time on Google Trends →

Common questions

What is Front used for?
Front is a customer-communication platform built around a shared inbox. It unifies email, chat, SMS, and social messages into one workspace so teams can triage, assign, comment internally, and reply together, keeping the personal feel of email with the coordination of support software.
How is Front different from a help desk like Zendesk?
A traditional help desk turns messages into numbered tickets, which is efficient but impersonal. Front keeps replies email-like and personal while adding assignment, collaboration, and analytics, appealing to teams that value high-touch relationships over industrial-scale case management.
How is Front different from a shared email address?
Sharing one mailbox login causes chaos — duplicate replies, missed messages, no accountability. Front adds clear ownership of each conversation, internal notes customers never see, and visibility into the team's workload, without converting messages into tickets.

Resources & people to follow

Curated, non-competitor resources verified per term.

Related training

Disciplines

Areas of marketing where front is a core concern:

Sources

  1. trendsGoogle Trends — "front app"