Growth Marketing Glossary

Radius Targeting

ra·di·us tar·get·ingnoun

A circle around a point. Radius targeting serves ads only to people within a set distance of a location — the simplest way to keep spend local.

a chosen locationtarget within a radiusnearby users only
Schematic — a circle of coverage around a point
Term
Radius targeting
Is
Ads within a set distance of a point
Shape
A circle, or radius
Type
Geographic or local targeting

Parts of speech & senses

radius targeting · noun
  1. Radius targeting is a form of geographic ad targeting that shows ads only to users within a set distance — a radius — around a chosen point, such as a store or event location. "A three-mile radius targeting circle cut the waste."

What radius targeting is

Radius targeting is a way of aiming advertising by geography: you pick a central point — a store, a venue, a neighborhood — and choose a distance around it, and ads are shown only to users within that circle. Set a three-mile radius around a restaurant and only people inside that ring see the ad; someone across town does not. It is one of the simplest forms of geographic, or geo, targeting, used heavily in local marketing where relevance falls off sharply with distance. A coffee shop, a dentist, a gym, or a pop-up event has little reason to advertise to people who will never realistically travel to it, and radius targeting keeps the spend concentrated on the area from which customers actually come. The mechanism is a point and a distance, nothing more.

Radius targeting matters because paying to reach people outside a plausible catchment area is waste, and for many local businesses that waste can be most of the budget. By drawing a circle sized to how far customers really travel, radius targeting focuses spend on reachable prospects and improves the efficiency of every other lever — a local offer, a store-visit goal, an event promotion. It is easy to set up and easy to reason about, which is part of its appeal: a single point and a mileage figure define the whole target. The main judgment is choosing the right radius. Too tight and you exclude customers who would gladly come. Too wide and you pay to reach people who never will. The circle should match the real geography of demand.

Radius targeting versus geofencing

Radius targeting is often confused with geofencing, and while both are location-based, they differ in precision and intent. Radius targeting draws a simple circle — a point and a distance — around a location and serves ads to users within it; the shape is always a ring, and the granularity is coarse. Geofencing draws a precise virtual boundary around a specific real-world area — the exact footprint of a store, a stadium, a competitor's parking lot, a trade-show hall — that can follow irregular shapes rather than a circle, and it often triggers on a user entering, or having entered, that boundary. So radius targeting is the blunt instrument of local geo, and geofencing is the scalpel, built for tighter, shaped, sometimes real-time targeting of very specific places.

The practical difference is how exactly you can define where. If a plausible catchment is roughly circular — everyone within a few miles of a shop — radius targeting is simpler and perfectly adequate. If you need to target a precise, irregular, or small area — only people who actually enter a particular building, or who were at a specific event — geofencing's shaped boundary and entry triggers do what a crude circle cannot. Radius targeting cannot exclude the wrong half of its circle or hug an odd shape. Geofencing can. The cost is complexity: geofencing needs more precise data and setup. Choosing between them is a question of how much geographic precision the campaign actually requires, and reaching for geofencing when a simple radius would do just adds effort without benefit.

Using radius targeting well

Using radius targeting well is mostly about sizing the circle to real demand. Base the radius on how far customers genuinely travel to the location, which varies enormously — a convenience store draws from a few blocks, a destination retailer from many miles — rather than on a round default. Consider layering radius targeting with other signals, such as the audience or the time of day, so a well-placed circle is also aimed at the right people. Where the catchment is not actually circular — bounded by a river, a highway, or a city edge — recognize the limits of a ring and consider a shaped boundary instead. The aim is a target that matches the geography from which the business realistically wins customers, tight enough to avoid waste and wide enough to catch them.

The failure modes are setting a radius by habit rather than by real catchment, using a coarse circle where the geography demands a precise or irregular boundary, and treating location as the only targeting lever when audience and timing also matter. A radius that is too wide bleeds budget on people who will never visit. One that is too tight starves the campaign of reachable customers. And a circle imposed on a catchment that is not circular either includes the wrong areas or excludes the right ones. The discipline is to size the radius to how customers actually move, layer it with other signals, and step up to geofencing when the precision genuinely warrants it. Radius targeting is a simple, effective tool as long as the circle honestly reflects where demand lives.

Worked example. A gym runs ads across its whole metro area and burns most of its budget on people who would never cross town to work out. Switching to radius targeting, it draws a circle sized to where its members actually live and commute — a few miles, not the whole city — and serves ads only inside it. Reach shrinks but relevance rises, and cost per new member falls because the spend is concentrated on people who can realistically join. Where a highway splits the catchment awkwardly, the gym later moves to a shaped geofence for that edge. The lesson is that radius targeting shows ads to users within a set distance of a location — a simple circle, coarser than a drawn geofence — and its value depends on sizing that circle to real demand. (Illustrative; RGM analysis.)
Failure modes to watch. Setting the radius by habit instead of by real catchment, using a coarse circle where the geography demands a precise or irregular boundary, treating location as the only targeting lever, and drawing a circle so wide it wastes budget or so tight it starves the campaign.

Synonyms & antonyms

Synonyms

proximity targetinggeo-radius targetinglocal radius targeting

Antonyms

geofencingnational targeting

Origin & history

Radius targeting is a geotargeting method that limits ad delivery to a circular area around a location, a basic form of the location-based targeting used in digital advertising.

Etymology: source.

Usage trends

Search interest for this term over the last five years:

View interest-over-time on Google Trends →

Common questions

What is radius targeting?
A form of geographic ad targeting that shows ads only to users within a set distance — a radius — of a chosen point, such as a store or event. It keeps local spend focused on a plausible catchment area.
How is radius targeting different from geofencing?
Radius targeting draws a simple circle around a point. Geofencing draws a precise, often irregular boundary around a specific area and can trigger on entry. Radius targeting is the blunt tool; geofencing is the more precise one.
How do you choose the right radius?
Size it to how far customers actually travel to the location, which varies by business type. Too wide wastes budget on people who will never visit; too tight excludes customers who would gladly come.

Resources & people to follow

Curated, non-competitor resources verified per term.

Related training

Disciplines

Areas of marketing where radius targeting is a core concern:

Sources

  1. trendsGoogle Trends — "radius targeting"