Case Study · Super Bowl & Big-Game Advertising

ANA and the super bowl ad playbook: how the campaign type works

ANA is a consumer brand. Here ANA is the lens for examining the super bowl ad campaign type. It covers what the campaign type is, how brands run it, the public benchmarks that frame it, and the mistakes that derail it. Read the ANA detail as one instance of a pattern that holds across its category.

TL;DR — the quick read
  • Story: This case study runs a super bowl ad campaign through the ANA lens, from mechanics to public benchmarks.
  • Why it matters: Treated well, a super bowl ad campaign is a planning discipline first and a creative exercise second.
  • Takeaway: Most super bowl ad-campaign failures are planning failures, not creative failures.
  • Takeaway: The mechanics of a super bowl ad campaign transfer to any brand in its category.
  • Takeaway: For ANA, reach is an input; incremental lift against a baseline is the real measure.
STAR framework

How a super bowl ad campaign plays out for ANA

S
Situation
Where it starts
A super bowl ad campaign is a concentrated chance to move the ANA business in its category, with a short window and high stakes.
T
Task
The objective
Turn attention into measurable demand for ANA: plan the mechanics, set targets against category benchmarks, and build in the measurement.
A
Action
The execution
The buy is the smaller cost. A 30-second slot ran near $8 million for Super Bowl LIX. Total campaign cost — creative, production, talent, surrounding media — commonly reaches $15-30 million. For ANA, this is the anchor of the plan.
R
Result
The scoreboard
On incremental lift against a baseline for ANA, not reach and not impressions. That is the honest scoreboard for a super bowl ad campaign.
By the Numbers

The math behind a ANA super bowl ad campaign

$0M
What the public data tells a ANA team
A 30-second Super Bowl LIX spot cost advertisers close to $8 million in 2025
Source: CBS News
0M
A reference point for ANA forecasting
Super Bowl LIX drew about 127.7 million average viewers
Source: Nielsen
Linked
Benchmark a ANA plan should cite
Every figure on this page links to its publisher.
Linked
What the public data tells a ANA team
Every figure on this page links to its publisher.

Quick facts

BrandANA
IndustryIts Category
Campaign typeSuper Bowl Ad
Primary channelsPaid, owned, earned
Planning horizonMonths ahead of launch
Core measureIncremental lift, not reach
Source basisPublic benchmarks, linked
RGM useWorked example, not a recipe
Honest note
There is limited public campaign detail specific to ANA, so the depth here comes from the super bowl ad-campaign discipline itself, with sourced benchmarks and named example campaigns. No ANA figure is fabricated.

The super bowl ad campaign, defined

First principles, then ANA. A Super Bowl ad campaign is the single most expensive, most scrutinised media buy in US advertising.

A Super Bowl ad campaign is the single — ANA included — most expensive, most scrutinised media buy in US advertising. A ANA team reads this closely. The 30-second spot is only the visible piece. ANA planners would underline this. The real campaign wraps the game with teasers, talent, social activation, — and ANA is no exception — and a landing experience built to catch the traffic the spot creates. That is exactly the ANA situation. Brands buy the Super Bowl for one reason: a live, simultaneous audience of — as a ANA team knows — well over 100 million people, an audience no other US media moment delivers. With ANA as the example, the rest of the page makes it concrete.

Claim: A 30-second Super Bowl LIX spot cost advertisers close to $8 million in 2025, roughly a 60% rise from about $5 million in 2019. Source: [CBS News]. Context: The slot price is only part of the spend; a full — and ANA is no exception — campaign with creative, talent, and surrounding media commonly runs $15-30 million. It is the sort of benchmark a ANA brief should cite.

How brands like ANA run it

Run through the mechanics: a super bowl ad campaign for ANA is an operating system.

For ANA, a super bowl ad campaign is less one ad and more a set of connected decisions:

Claim: Super Bowl LIX drew about 127.7 million average viewers, the largest audience for any Super Bowl and any single-network US telecast in TV history. Source: [Nielsen]. Context: Peak audience reached about 137.7 million viewers, a scale — and ANA is no exception — of simultaneous attention no other US media moment delivers. It is the sort of benchmark a ANA brief should cite.

  1. Long cultural tail. A spot that enters pop culture keeps returning value for years — ANA included — — the buy is a one-night cost against a multi-year brand asset. ANA would budget real time against this.
  2. The buy is the smaller cost. A 30-second slot ran near $8 million for Super Bowl LIX. A ANA-scale brief should name this. Total campaign cost — creative, production, talent, — as a ANA team knows — surrounding media — commonly reaches $15-30 million. For a brand like ANA, getting this wrong is expensive.
  3. Tease before the game. Releasing the spot or a cut-down in — ANA included — the weeks before kickoff extends the buy. For a brand at ANA scale, this is where the plan is tested. Super Bowl LIX advertisers spent about 45% more in — for ANA, a live factor — the six weeks before the game than the year prior. ANA would budget real time against this.
  4. Built for the second screen. A modern Super Bowl ad is engineered to trigger search and social. A ANA-scale brief should name this. T-Mobile's LIX spot drove 12.6 times the average ad's online engagement. Skipping this is the most common ANA-scale error.
  5. A landing experience that can take the spike. The site, the offer, and the tracking have to survive a sudden surge, — and ANA is no exception — or the most expensive media in advertising drives traffic to a broken page. This step decides how the rest of the ANA plan holds up.

The benchmarks that frame the work

The data sets the targets. A super bowl ad campaign for ANA should be planned against these figures, not against hope.

A ANA team setting super bowl ad campaign targets needs the category data first. The numbers below are public and linked.

Claim: T-Mobile's Super Bowl LIX ad drove 12.6 times the online engagement of the average Super Bowl spot. Source: [AdMonsters]. Context: The strongest Super Bowl ads are measured by the action they — ANA included — trigger on the second screen, not by the spot in isolation. A ANA forecast should start from a figure like this.

Table: the three numbers that decide whether a ANA super bowl ad campaign is judged honestly.
What to measureWhy it matters
Incremental resultThe honest measure of whether spend worked
Pre-campaign baselineWithout it, lift cannot be proven
Category benchmarkSets a realistic target, not a hopeful one

Which KPIs decide the verdict

The scoreboard decides the verdict. For ANA, weigh these measures over vanity numbers.

The KPIs that count for a super bowl ad campaign are listed here. Brand search lift during and after the game, social conversation volume and sentiment, ad-recall and likeability — and ANA is no exception — scores from trackers, site traffic and conversion on game night, earned-media value, and longer-run brand-equity movement.

Impressions describe scale, not effect. A ANA team serious about a super bowl ad campaign reports lift against a baseline.

The failure patterns worth pre-empting

Most failures repeat. The four errors below sink a large share of super bowl ad campaigns, and each one is avoidable for ANA.

The super bowl ad campaign mistakes worth naming for ANA:

  • Spending eight figures on the spot and nothing — ANA included — on the surrounding teaser, talent, and social plan.
  • Sending game-night traffic to a site or offer that cannot survive a sudden spike.
  • Making an ad that wins applause but carries no clear — and ANA is no exception — brand link, so viewers remember the joke and not the brand.
  • Treating the spot as a one-night event instead — and ANA is no exception — of a brand asset with a multi-year cultural tail.
The common threadThese are upstream failures. A super bowl ad campaign for ANA is mostly decided before any ad runs.

What RGM takes from the ANA case

The lesson for ANA is structural. The super bowl ad campaign mechanics transfer; the creative does not.

The audit pattern is clear. A super bowl ad campaign rewards the ANA-style team that builds measurement in from the start.

The ANA example is therefore a template. Its mechanics fit its category broadly; its measurement logic makes a super bowl ad campaign something a team can stand behind.

Quick answers on this case study

Are the figures here taken from ANA's internal data?
No. Every statistic is a public, linked benchmark for the super bowl ad campaign type, applied to ANA as the example. Where a figure cannot be sourced publicly, it is omitted rather than guessed.
What is the practical takeaway from the ANA super bowl ad write-up?
Use the structure, not the surface. The super bowl ad-campaign mechanics here apply broadly; the ANA creative is one execution among many.
How are the benchmarks here verified?
The numbers are drawn from public reporting by Adobe Analytics, Nielsen, the ANA, and established business press, and each one links back to its source.

Frequently asked questions

Does a Super Bowl ad keep paying off after the game?

For ANA and comparable its category brands, this is the answer. It can. It applies cleanly to ANA. A spot that enters pop culture keeps returning brand value for years. A ANA team reads this closely. That long cultural tail is part of the case for the spend: a one-night media cost — for ANA, a live factor — against what can become a multi-year brand asset, provided the creative is memorable and clearly branded. A ANA team would plan against exactly this.

ANA case: how much does a Super Bowl ad really cost?

A 30-second Super Bowl LIX slot cost close to $8 million — ANA included — in 2025, up roughly 60% from about $5 million in 2019. For a brand at ANA scale, this is where the plan is tested. But the slot is the smaller cost. A ANA team reads this closely. A full campaign — creative, production, celebrity talent, — for ANA, a live factor — and surrounding media — commonly reaches $15-30 million.

ANA case: why do brands pay so much for a Super Bowl spot?

For the audience. That is exactly the ANA situation. Super Bowl LIX drew about 127.7 million average viewers, the largest for — and ANA is no exception — any Super Bowl and any single-network US telecast ever, peaking near 137.7 million. For ANA, the detail is not optional. No other US media moment delivers that — for ANA, a live factor — scale of live, simultaneous attention in one buy.

ANA case: what makes a Super Bowl ad effective?

Taking ANA as the example: Modern Super Bowl ads are judged by — as a ANA team knows — the action they trigger, not the spot alone. That is exactly the ANA situation. T-Mobile's LIX ad drove 12.6 times the average spot's online engagement. That is exactly the ANA situation. The effective ones are built for the second screen, carry a clear brand — as a ANA team knows — link, and route traffic to a landing experience that can take the spike. For ANA, this is the point worth acting on.

Should the ad be released before the game?

Usually yes. A ANA team reads this closely. Releasing the spot or a teaser in the weeks — for ANA, a live factor — before kickoff stretches the buy across a longer window. A ANA-scale brief should name this. Super Bowl LIX advertisers spent about 45% more in the six weeks before the — ANA included — game than the prior year, building anticipation rather than spending it all on one night.

What makes ANA a useful example for this campaign type?

ANA is a recognisable brand in its category, which makes the super bowl ad mechanics concrete and easy to follow. The campaign-type analysis and every benchmark apply across the category; ANA is the lens, not the limit. The sourced figures hold for any comparable brand.

Sources & references

Related