Case Study · Inclusive Launch · Beauty · 2017

Fenty Beauty: how 40 launch shades changed an entire category

On September 8, 2017, Rihanna and LVMH’s Kendo Brands launched Fenty Beauty with 40 foundation shades available from day one — in a category where the prestige standard was about 20 shades, weighted toward lighter tones. Reported revenue passed $100 million in the first 40 days. Within two years, every major beauty brand had expanded its shade range. The launch worked because the inclusivity wasn't in the marketing copy — it was in the SKU count.

TL;DR — the quick read
  • Story: Rihanna and LVMH’s Kendo Brands launched Fenty Beauty on September 8, 2017 with 40 foundation shades available from day one — in a category where the standard was ~20 shades. Reported $100M+ revenue in the first 40 days.
  • Why it matters: The central case for inclusivity as both moral position and competitive wedge. Fenty shipped a product that the incumbents couldn’t match because their R&D and supply chain weren’t aligned to it.
  • Takeaway: Inclusivity has to be in the SKU count, not in the marketing copy — competitors can copy the message; the product gap takes years to close.
  • Takeaway: Celebrity-led brands work when the celebrity controls a real product decision; they fail when the celebrity is a face on someone else’s product.
  • Takeaway: Launch with the differentiator at full scale (40 shades, day one) — not as a phased expansion.
STAR framework

Fenty Beauty — the four-step story

S
Situation
Beauty foundations ignored most skin tones
In 2017, the standard foundation lineup for most prestige brands was about 20 shades, weighted heavily toward lighter tones. Women with deeper skin tones routinely couldn't find foundation that matched at any price point.
T
Task
Launch with the inclusivity gap already solved
Make day-one shade range itself the differentiator competitors couldn't copy in time. The R&D and supply chain to support 40 launch shades takes years to build — the head start has to be earned, not announced.
A
Action
Launch September 2017 with 40 foundation shades
Rihanna and LVMH's Kendo Brands launched Fenty Beauty September 8, 2017 with 40 foundation shades available from day one (Pro Filt'r Soft Matte Longwear). Global Sephora distribution + fentybeauty.com. Marketing led with the shade range, not the celebrity.
R
Result
$100M+ in first 40 days, brand worth $3B+ by 2024
Reported $100M+ revenue in the first 40 days (Forbes, WWD). Shade count expanded to 50 by 2019. Brand valuation estimated at $3B+ by 2024. The "Fenty effect" forced every major beauty brand to expand its shade range.
By the Numbers

Fenty Beauty at a glance

0
Launch foundation shades
vs ~20 shades industry standard at the time
Source: Fenty Beauty launch materials
$0M+
Revenue in first 40 days
Reported launch-window revenue
Source: Forbes / WWD reporting
0
Launch date
September 8, 2017 — global Sephora + fentybeauty.com
Source: LVMH/Kendo press
0
Shade expansion (by 2019)
Continued shade-count leadership post-launch
Source: Fenty Beauty SKU list
0
Celebrity founder
Rihanna with real product authority via Kendo
Source: LVMH/Kendo structure
$0B+
Brand valuation (2024)
LVMH disclosure / public press estimates
Source: Public press reporting

Quick facts

BrandFenty Beauty by Rihanna (Kendo Brands / LVMH)
FounderRobyn Rihanna Fenty (with LVMH’s Kendo Brands)
Launch dateSeptember 8, 2017
Launch foundation shades40 (Pro Filt’r Soft Matte Longwear Foundation)
Subsequent expansion50 shades by 2019
Distribution at launchSephora globally + fentybeauty.com
Reported first-40-day revenue$100M+ (Forbes, WWD reporting)
Brand valuation (2024)$3B+ (LVMH / public press estimates)
Honest note
The $100M-plus first-40-day revenue figure is reported by Forbes, WWD, and industry trade press and is widely accepted; LVMH and Kendo Brands have not formally confirmed it. The $3B+ brand valuation in 2024 reflects industry estimates and LVMH context, not a public disclosure. The “Fenty Effect” on competitor shade ranges is well documented across multiple industry retrospectives.

Where prestige beauty was in 2017

In 2017, the standard foundation lineup for most prestige beauty brands was about 20 shades, weighted heavily toward lighter tones. Estée Lauder, MAC, Bobbi Brown, Lancôme — all the big prestige brands sold foundation in a range that was workable for women with lighter skin tones and inadequate for women with deeper skin tones. The gap had been documented for years. Beauty critics had been calling it out. But the structural inertia was real: expanding shade range requires R&D investment, supply-chain capacity, and inventory holdings the existing brands hadn’t built.

The market opportunity was visible to anyone willing to look at it. Women with deeper skin tones were a real, underserved market. The brand that could ship a credible 40-shade range on launch day would have a meaningful head start — not because the marketing claim would be hard to copy (it wasn’t), but because the R&D and supply-chain work behind the range would take competitors years to match.

The launch

Rihanna had been working with LVMH’s Kendo Brands incubator on Fenty Beauty for years before the September 8, 2017 launch. The strategic move was deciding to launch with 40 shades on day one, not as a phased expansion. The R&D, manufacturing, supply chain, and inventory all had to be built to support that decision before the brand could go to market.

A few structural choices made the launch land hard:

  • 40 shades on day one. Not 20, not phased rollout, not “more shades coming next year.” The full range was on shelves at Sephora globally on launch day. The R&D head start was the head start.
  • Marketing led with the range, not the celebrity. Rihanna’s involvement was visible, but the launch creative emphasized the shade range, the foundation performance, and inclusion. The celebrity was the megaphone; the product was the message.
  • Global Sephora distribution from launch. Sephora's global footprint gave the brand instant retail presence in markets prestige beauty entrants usually spend years building into.
  • Real product quality. The Pro Filt’r foundation was actually good — the shade range mattered, but the foundation also performed at the prestige-quality level the price point required. Customers who tried it kept buying.
Why launching at full scale beats phased expansionPhased expansion is the natural choice when you’re cautious about inventory risk or want to gauge demand. Full-range launch is the strategic choice when you have a competitive head start the market won’t let you keep. Fenty's 40-shade launch was the move that defined the brand — if it had launched with 20 shades and added 20 more in year two, it would have been easy for competitors to match by year two. The 40-shade launch made the inclusivity claim concrete and unmatchable, and competitors needed years to close the gap.

What grew, and what came with it

Reported revenue passed $100 million in the first 40 days — an unprecedented launch number in prestige beauty. The shade range expanded to 50 by 2019. Industry-estimated brand valuation reached $3 billion+ by 2024. Fenty Beauty became one of the most successful prestige beauty launches in modern history.

The broader category response is the part that’s called “the Fenty Effect.” Within 18 months of the Fenty launch, virtually every major prestige beauty brand had expanded its foundation range. Some brands launched 40-shade ranges within two years. The implicit message to the industry was that the existing shade-range standards weren't defensible and that any brand that ignored the inclusive market was leaving money on the table. The Fenty Effect compressed years of overdue category change into roughly 18 months of competitor response.

What other brands tried to copy

Many beauty brands have tried to follow Fenty's playbook of celebrity-founded, inclusivity-led launches in the years since. Some have worked (Kylie Cosmetics, Selena Gomez’s Rare Beauty). Many haven't produced comparable results, for a few reasons:

  • The celebrity didn't control product. Rihanna had real product authority through Kendo. Brands where the celebrity is a face on someone else’s product can’t produce the same authenticity.
  • The launch range was too small. Brands that launched with 20-25 shades after Fenty couldn't claim the inclusive-launch position. The 40-shade bar had been set.
  • The product wasn't good enough. Fenty’s foundation performed at the prestige-quality level. Brands that traded on celebrity name alone without comparable product quality lost trial customers fast.
  • Distribution leverage wasn't there. Fenty had global Sephora distribution from launch through LVMH’s relationship. Brands without that retail footprint had to build it over years, losing the launch-window advantage.

How RGM thinks about inclusive-product launches

When clients ask about inclusive-product launches, the Fenty case is useful as both an example and a reality check. The example is that inclusion baked into the product (SKU count, range, fit) is much harder to copy than inclusion in the marketing copy. The reality check is that the R&D and supply-chain investment required to ship that level of inclusion on day one is significant, and most brands aren't willing to make that investment before they have demand validation.

The honest framework: if the inclusivity is real in the product, the marketing can be quiet about it and the customers will notice. If the inclusivity is only in the marketing, customers will eventually notice that too — in the other direction. Fenty got the order right (product first, marketing as megaphone) and the launch worked. Most copies got the order wrong (marketing first, product expansion someday) and the launches didn’t produce comparable trust.

Frequently asked questions

Did Fenty really launch with 40 shades?

Yes — 40 shades of Pro Filt’r Soft Matte Longwear Foundation on launch day, September 8, 2017. The range expanded to 50 shades by 2019. The 40-shade-on-day-one number is the figure that became shorthand for the launch and the broader Fenty Effect on the category.

How is Fenty Beauty structured?

Fenty Beauty is owned by Kendo Brands, a beauty incubator inside LVMH (the Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy group). Rihanna is the founder and creative lead. The Kendo / LVMH structure provides operational, supply-chain, and distribution support that an independent celebrity-founder beauty brand wouldn’t have access to.

Is the $100M-in-40-days figure accurate?

It's the figure widely reported by Forbes, WWD, and industry trade press during the launch window. LVMH and Kendo Brands haven’t officially confirmed it, but it's been consistently cited across credible sources and aligns with the visible launch-period commerce activity (sold-out shades, restock issues, Sephora display reports).

What is the "Fenty Effect"?

The shorthand for the broader-category response to Fenty's 40-shade launch. Within roughly 18 months of the Fenty launch, virtually every major prestige beauty brand had expanded its foundation range, often to 30-40+ shades. The category-wide shift toward inclusive shade ranges was driven by Fenty's success and the implicit pressure on competitors to catch up.

Has Fenty stayed innovative since the launch?

The brand has expanded into skincare (Fenty Skin), fragrance (Fenty Eau de Parfum), and additional makeup categories. The original launch-window cultural moment is hard to replicate, but the brand has remained a meaningful player in prestige beauty and has continued to set the standard for shade-range inclusivity across its product launches.

Sources & references

Related