Case Study · Hardware Launch Failure · AI Wearables · 2023-2025

Humane AI Pin (2023-2025): the $230 million wearable that HP bought for parts

Humane was founded in 2018 by two former senior Apple designers, Imran Chaudhri and Bethany Bongiorno, with the thesis that an AI-powered wearable could replace the smartphone as a primary computing device. The company raised approximately $230 million in venture funding, unveiled the AI Pin in November 2023, and shipped the product to first customers on April 11, 2024 at $699 plus a $24 monthly subscription. Reviews were among the worst in modern consumer hardware. Marques Brownlee titled his YouTube review “The Worst Product I’ve Ever Reviewed… For Now.” By August 2024 daily returns exceeded sales and the charging case was recalled for a lithium-battery fire hazard. In February 2025, HP acquired most of Humane Inc. for approximately $116 million, discontinued the AI Pin device, and absorbed the team into HP’s AI organization. The case is now studied as a cautionary tale about hardware-first AI product strategy.

TL;DR — the quick read
  • Story: Humane founded 2018 by former Apple executives. Raised $230M from Sam Altman, Marc Benioff, Microsoft, LG, others. AI Pin revealed November 2023 at TED Talk. Shipped April 11, 2024 at $699 + $24/month. MKBHD published 'The Worst Product I've Ever Reviewed... For Now' April 17, 2024 (7M+ views). Multiple overwhelmingly negative reviews. Failed sale attempt at $1B+ mid-2024.
  • Why it matters: Humane AI Pin is the defining recent hardware product launch failure — demonstrating that founder-pedigree premium can produce funding exceeding what subsequent product execution justifies.
  • Takeaway: Founder-pedigree premium can produce funding that exceeds what subsequent product execution can justify.
  • Takeaway: AI-product launches need genuine product utility, not just AI capability — positioning as smartphone-replacement didn't survive contact with actual use cases.
  • Takeaway: Extensive pre-release secrecy can prevent valuable feedback that would identify product problems before launch.
STAR framework

Humane AI Pin launch failure — the four-step story

S
Situation
Situation
Humane founded 2018 by former Apple executives Imran Chaudhri and Bethany Bongiorno. Raised ~$230M across multiple venture rounds from prominent AI/tech investors. Built AI-powered wearable device in secrecy for ~5 years.
T
Task
Task
Launch AI Pin as alternative to smartphones for AI-mediated interactions and validate the funding-implied product opportunity.
A
Action
Action
November 2023 TED Talk reveal. Pre-orders opened at $699 + $24/month subscription. April 11, 2024 shipped to first customers. April 17, 2024 MKBHD published 'Worst Product I've Ever Reviewed' video. Multiple overwhelmingly negative reviews followed.
R
Result
Result
Product widely characterized as one of most-public consumer-electronics launch failures. Multiple operational and safety issues. Failed $1B+ sale attempts mid-2024. Significantly below 2023 expectations. Defining recent hardware-launch failure cautionary tale.
By the Numbers

Humane AI Pin failure by the numbers

0
Humane founded
Former Apple executives
Source: Humane history
~$0M
Total funding
Across multiple rounds
Source: Funding records
0
AI Pin TED reveal
Initial public announcement
Source: TED records
0
AI Pin shipped
To first customers
Source: Humane announcement
$0
Pricing
Device plus subscription
Source: Humane pricing
0M+
MKBHD review views
'Worst Product Ever' video
Source: YouTube records

Quick facts

CompanyHumane Inc.
FoundersImran Chaudhri and Bethany Bongiorno (former Apple)
Founded2018
Total venture funding raised~$230 million (Kleiner Perkins, Tiger Global, Salesforce, Microsoft, OpenAI’s Sam Altman, others)
AI Pin unveiledNovember 9, 2023
AI Pin first shippedApril 11, 2024
Launch price$699 device + $24/month subscription
Marques Brownlee review title“The Worst Product I’ve Ever Reviewed… For Now”
Charging case recallJune 2024 (lithium-ion fire hazard)
Reported sales trajectoryBy August 2024, daily returns were exceeding daily sales (per The Verge reporting)
HP acquisitionFebruary 18, 2025, for ~$116 million
Post-acquisition statusAI Pin device discontinued; Humane team and IP absorbed into HP’s AI organization (CosmOS / HP IQ)
Honest note
The $230 million venture-funding total and the $116 million HP acquisition price are the figures most consistently reported across reputable tech press (Bloomberg, The Verge, TechCrunch, Wall Street Journal). Humane was privately held and did not publish unit sales; the reporting that daily returns exceeded daily sales by August 2024 came from The Verge citing internal documents, which Humane disputed at the time. The AI Pin device itself was discontinued as part of the HP transaction. Some specific subscription numbers and return percentages remain contested between Humane’s public statements and the press reporting.

Where Humane came from

Imran Chaudhri spent more than two decades at Apple and was a senior designer on the iPhone, the iPad, and Apple Watch human-interface work. Bethany Bongiorno was a director of software engineering at Apple who led the launch of the original iPad and worked on iOS and macOS. They left Apple to co-found Humane in 2018 with the explicit thesis that the smartphone era was ending and that a new AI-native computing device could replace the phone as a primary interface.

The pitch attracted blue-chip venture money. Across multiple rounds from 2019 through 2023, Humane raised approximately $230 million from Kleiner Perkins, Tiger Global, Forerunner, Salesforce, Microsoft, LG, Qualcomm, and Sam Altman, among others. Pre-launch valuations were reported as high as $850 million. The company spent five years in stealth-to-semi-stealth development; the product itself was not publicly demoed in detail until late 2023.

The AI Pin product and launch

The AI Pin was unveiled at TED in April 2023 in a brief demo by Chaudhri, then formally launched on November 9, 2023. The device was a small square wearable that clipped to clothing via a magnetic battery booster. It had no screen; instead, a laser projector cast a low-resolution monochrome interface onto the user’s palm. Interaction was primarily voice and gesture. The device used a custom AI “operating system” called CosmOS that brokered queries to large language models (initially OpenAI) and other services. Pricing was $699 for the device plus $24 per month for the always-on cellular and AI-services subscription.

First customer shipments began April 11, 2024. The first wave of long-form reviews arrived within days. The consensus was severe: the device was slow, the laser projection was hard to read in normal light, voice recognition was unreliable, battery life was poor, the device ran hot, and the core promise — that AI could substitute for a phone-screen interface for everyday tasks — was not delivered.

The reception and the unraveling

Marques Brownlee’s YouTube review on April 14, 2024 was titled “The Worst Product I’ve Ever Reviewed… For Now.” The Verge, Wired, and The Wall Street Journal published similarly harsh reviews. Within weeks the story shifted from product reception to operational survival. The Verge reported in August 2024, citing internal documents, that daily returns were exceeding daily sales and that total returns had pushed the install base below 8,000 units. Humane publicly disputed some specific figures but did not produce countervailing unit-sales data.

In June 2024 the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission warned consumers to stop using the AI Pin’s charging case because of a lithium-ion battery fire hazard, and Humane offered replacement cases. The company explored sale paths through summer 2024 with reported asking prices in the $750 million to $1 billion range — figures the press treated as wishful given the underlying commercial trajectory.

The HP transaction

On February 18, 2025, HP announced that it had acquired Humane’s assets, including the CosmOS platform, most of the engineering team, and the intellectual property, for approximately $116 million. The AI Pin device itself was discontinued. HP stated that the team would be incorporated into a new AI-platform organization (later associated with HP’s IQ initiative) building AI capabilities for HP’s broader hardware portfolio. Customers who had purchased an AI Pin received limited support windows; cellular service for the devices was wound down within months.

On the financial side, an approximately $230 million-funded company sold for approximately $116 million in asset value is a roughly 50 percent recovery against gross funding, before counting the unfunded customer-service liabilities and refunds. For the investor stack, this was a substantial loss against entry prices; for HP, it was a relatively cheap way to acquire an Apple-trained design and AI-systems team plus the CosmOS codebase.

How RGM thinks about hardware-first AI product strategy

When clients ask about launching new AI-native devices, the AI Pin case is the most recent and most clearly-documented warning. Three structural mistakes compound in the story. First, the product was launched before the underlying AI models could reliably support the use cases the device was sold against — the latency and accuracy of voice-to-action workflows in 2024 were not where they needed to be for a phone-replacement device. Second, the form-factor choices (laser projection, no screen) added cost and friction without delivering capability the smartphone could not. Third, the price point and subscription combined meant the device had to be genuinely better than a smartphone-plus-app combination, which it was not.

The pattern is not that AI-native hardware cannot work — Meta’s Ray-Ban smart glasses, Apple Watch, and various ambient-computing pilots have found product-market fit in narrower use cases. The pattern is that the gap between “impressive demo” and “reliable daily-use product” is much larger for AI-native hardware than for software, and that hardware launch economics — supply chain commits, retail SKUs, regulatory approvals — do not allow for the iterative refinement that AI software typically gets. We tell clients to insist on a stable, narrow first use case where the AI reliably outperforms the existing alternative, rather than betting on a category-replacement narrative.

Frequently asked questions

How much money did Humane raise before failing?

Approximately $230 million across multiple venture rounds from 2019 through 2023, from Kleiner Perkins, Tiger Global, Forerunner, Salesforce, Microsoft, LG, Qualcomm, Sam Altman, and others. Pre-launch valuation reporting reached approximately $850 million.

What was wrong with the AI Pin specifically?

A combination of issues: the laser projection on the palm was hard to read in normal light; the device ran hot and had short battery life; voice recognition and AI response latency were poor; and the device required a $24/month subscription on top of the $699 hardware. The fundamental problem was that the AI Pin did not do any everyday task as well as a phone, and was sold at a price that required it to.

What did Marques Brownlee say?

Brownlee’s April 14, 2024 review was titled “The Worst Product I’ve Ever Reviewed… For Now.” The review went broadly viral within the tech-press world and was widely treated as the catalyst for the negative coverage cycle that followed. Other reviews (The Verge, Wired, Wall Street Journal) reached similar conclusions independently.

What happened to existing AI Pin owners?

After HP’s acquisition in February 2025 and the device’s discontinuation, cellular service was wound down within months and the device’s cloud features stopped working. HP offered limited transition support. Owners who had paid $699 plus accumulated subscription fees were left with non-functional hardware.

Why did HP buy the team?

HP’s rationale, as stated in its acquisition announcement, was to acquire the CosmOS AI-OS technology and the Apple-trained design-and-engineering team to seed an AI-platform group inside HP. The hardware product itself was clearly not the asset HP valued. The $116 million price was substantially below Humane’s prior-round valuations, suggesting HP got the team and IP at distress pricing.

Sources & references

Related