Netflix (2022-2024): the ad tier, the password-sharing crackdown, and the most successful streaming-business reset of the decade

How Netflix got to the Q1 2022 reset

For most of the 2010s, Netflix grew subscribers and revenue annually almost without exception. The 2020-2021 pandemic period accelerated the growth dramatically as locked-down households signed up at unprecedented rates. By Q4 2021, Netflix had more than 220 million global paid subscribers. The growth had outrun what management had publicly told investors to expect, and the post-pandemic normalization — subscriber churn rising as households unlocked, content costs continuing to climb, FX headwinds, and competition from Disney+, Max, Paramount+, Peacock and Amazon Prime Video — was waiting on the other side.

On April 19, 2022, Netflix reported Q1 2022 results: a net loss of approximately 200,000 paid subscribers, its first quarterly decline since 2011, with guidance for another 2 million decline in Q2. The stock fell roughly 35% the next day. The decline was relatively small in absolute terms but it broke the growth narrative the company had built its valuation around. Within weeks, Netflix publicly reversed its long-standing positions against an ad-supported tier and against monetizing shared passwords.

The ad tier launch

Netflix announced the ad tier in April-July 2022 and launched Basic with Ads on November 3, 2022 in 12 initial markets including the US ($6.99/month), UK, Canada, Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, and Spain. The launch partnered with Microsoft for the underlying ad-tech stack and ad-sales relationships. Initial pricing was set substantially below the ad-free Standard tier to create an obvious step-down option, and the ad tier was initially restricted from some content licenses (a constraint that Netflix worked through over the subsequent year).

The launch’s first months produced modest sign-ups. By mid-2023 the company stopped reporting individual ad-tier sub counts, then in early 2024 began disclosing milestones: 23 million MAU in January 2024, 40 million by May 2024, and approximately 70 million by mid-2024. In ad-eligible markets, the ad tier accounted for approximately 40% of new sign-ups by 2024. Netflix described the unit economics of the ad tier as already attractive on a per-subscriber-per-month basis when ad revenue was combined with subscription revenue.

The paid-sharing crackdown

Netflix piloted paid-sharing enforcement in Latin America starting in mid-2022, then rolled the policy to Canada, New Zealand, Portugal, and Spain in Q1 2023. The major US, UK, Australia, and 100+ market rollout came on May 23, 2023. The mechanics: a Netflix subscription was now restricted to a single household; users wanting to share with people outside the household could add “extra members” for an additional fee (initially $7.99/month in the US for the Standard plan).

The market reception was unexpectedly favorable. The widely-anticipated mass-cancellation wave did not materialize; instead, many shared accounts converted to new paid subscriptions or extra-member add-ons. Q2 2023 net additions came in at approximately 5.9 million, Q3 2023 at 8.8 million, and Q4 2023 at 13.1 million — the strongest non-pandemic quarter Netflix had ever produced. Netflix attributed the growth to a combination of password-sharing conversion, ad-tier acquisition, and a strong content slate (the 2023 writers’ and actors’ strikes ironically benefited Netflix relative to peers because Netflix entered the strike with a deeper finished pipeline).

How RGM thinks about this for subscription-business clients

When clients ask about how to grow a saturated subscription business, the Netflix 2022-2024 sequence is the structural example we point to. Three things were unusual about the execution. First, Netflix made the change to a coordinated set of moves — tier addition, sharing crackdown, content slate strength, and price discipline — rather than a single policy lever. The package effect produced the result; isolated moves would have leaked into churn. Second, the company sequenced the changes carefully: ad tier first to give cheaper-subscription option, then sharing crackdown six months later so that displaced sharers had a low-friction landing option. The sequencing protected against the worst-case cancellation outcome. Third, Netflix executed the changes despite its prior public statements that they were against the company’s principles; the willingness to reverse position under data pressure is a leadership characteristic that not every subscription business has.

The pattern is hard to copy if the underlying product is weaker or the market is more competitive. Netflix had two structural advantages: a deep content moat that made cancellation costly for users, and a competitive set (Disney+, Max) facing their own losses that limited the price competition Netflix faced. Subscription businesses without those advantages should expect a harder version of the same playbook. We tell clients to think about coordinating the levers, sequencing the moves to protect against cancellation cliffs, and reading the customer-base elasticity carefully before committing.

Frequently asked questions

Related