Wordle and the New York Times (2021-2022): the $1-million-plus acquisition that brought tens of millions of new players

How Wordle grew

Josh Wardle built the game in 2020 as a personal project for his partner, Palak Shah, who liked word puzzles. The game design was simple: one five-letter word per day, six guesses, green-yellow-gray color feedback indicating which letters were in the correct position, which letters were in the word but in a wrong position, and which letters were not in the word. The game had two design choices that turned out to be commercially important: one puzzle per day for all players (so the game cannot be binged) and a shareable result-grid (colored emoji squares that show the shape of your guesses without revealing the word).

Wardle made the game publicly available in October 2021. The shareable result-grid was the growth loop. Players who completed the puzzle could copy a small grid of colored squares to share on social media without spoiling the day’s word. The grids were visually distinctive, didn’t need explanation, and made the game socially-discoverable. By late December 2021 the game had a few hundred thousand daily players. The New York Times wrote a feature article about the game on January 3, 2022 (“Wordle Is a Love Story”). By the next week the player count was over 2 million.

The NYT acquisition

The New York Times Games team had been building out a portfolio of daily-puzzle products since 2014: the Crossword (long-running), Spelling Bee (acquired 2014), Letter Boxed, Tiles, and others. The strategic position was that puzzles drive habit-forming engagement and habit-forming engagement converts to subscriptions over time. The Times’s digital-subscriber strategy at the time aimed for 10 million subscribers by 2025.

Jonathan Knight (head of NYT Games) contacted Wardle on January 5, 2022, two days after the Times feature article had run. The deal closed by January 31, 2022. The reported price was “low seven-figure” — at least $1 million, possibly several. Wardle later explained in interviews that part of the reason he accepted the buyout was to avoid the drama of dealing with cloned and copycat Wordle products that had begun appearing on app stores. The Times committed to keeping Wordle free initially and not changing the core game.

What the acquisition produced

The NYT Q1 2022 earnings release (April 2022) reported that the Wordle acquisition had brought “tens of millions” of new visitors to the Times’s games products, with significant subsequent cross-play of other puzzles. The Games subscriber base — subscribers who pay specifically for the games products — grew meaningfully in 2022 and beyond. The Times’s overall digital subscriber base passed 10 million in early 2024, ahead of the 2025 target. Wordle is not the only reason but it was a contributor to the trajectory.

Some friction emerged. The Times moved Wordle from Wardle’s original domain to nytimes.com/games/wordle in October 2022; some longtime players objected to the navigation change. The Times revised the word list slightly to remove some obscure or potentially offensive solutions; some players objected to the editorial change. The introduction of a leaderboard and statistics features generated mixed reception. Overall the player base has remained large and the integration has been treated as a successful acquisition by the financial-press coverage.

How RGM thinks about audience-acquisition through small acquisitions

When clients in media or consumer-internet ask about acquisition strategy, the NYT-Wordle case is the clearest example of low-cost audience-acquisition through targeted small-acquisitions. Three structural lessons. First, the price paid for an audience-acquiring acquisition can be remarkably low when the acquired product is at the inflection point of viral growth but has not yet been built into a business. A “low seven-figure” price for a product that brought tens of millions of new visitors is a CAC of pennies per visitor — orders of magnitude below paid-acquisition rates for media audiences. Second, the acquiring company has to have the integration capability to convert the acquired audience into subscribers; without the Times’s pre-existing Games portfolio and subscription infrastructure, the Wordle acquisition would have been much less valuable. Third, the timing matters — the Times approached Wardle on January 5, 2022, at the moment when player growth was vertical and Wardle was overwhelmed by clone-product drama. Buyers who wait until the product has fully built out an independent business position end up paying much more (potentially orders of magnitude more) for the same audience.

The pattern is generalizable to other audience-acquisition opportunities. The structural conditions are: a product with authentic organic growth, a creator who is overwhelmed by the operational demands of scaling, and a buyer with pre-existing distribution and conversion infrastructure that can integrate the product. We tell clients in media, consumer-software, and B2C subscription categories to maintain proactive tracking of organic-growth indie products in their category and to develop a rapid-acquisition capability for the moment when one of those products hits inflection.

Frequently asked questions

Related